(PC) Navarro v. Singh,et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20201:19-cv-00018California1,179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY H. NAVARRO, No. 1:19-cv-00018-NONE-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v. RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THE

ACTION

SINGH, et al., (Doc. No. 12) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Larry H. Navarro is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed his original complaint alleging that defendants, medical personnel at the prison where plaintiff is incarcerated, were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. (Doc. No. 1 at 3–4.) In addition, plaintiff brought a claim for negligence under state law. (Id. at 5.) The assigned magistrate judge issued a screening order finding that plaintiff did not state a cognizable claim under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.