Dauster

Integon National Insurance Company v. Dauster

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20201:19-cv-01429California480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INTEGON NATIONAL INSURANCE ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-01429-NONE-JLT

COMPANY, )

Plaintiff, ) ) O SAR ND CE TR I OTO N SP L SA HI ON UT LIF DF N T OO T S BH EO IW M PC OA SU ES DE FOR 13 v. ) )

F OA RI DL EU RR E A NTO D C FAO IM LUPL RY E W TOIT PH R T OH SEE C C UO TU ER T’S ) MICHAEL DAUSTER., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

Plaintiff initiated this action for interpretation of a homeowner’s insurance policy it issued to Michael Dauster, seeking a judicial declaration that Integon has no duty under the policy to defend or indemnify related to a swimming pool accident. The Clerk of Court entered default against the defendants remaining in this action, Michael Dauster and Megan Blackmon. (Docs. 14, 15) Therefore, the Court ordered Plaintiff to “seek default judgment as to the two remaining defendants” no later than March 13, 2020. (Doc. 25) To date, Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.