Doe
Doe v. El Dorado Union High School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, an individual; and No. 2:18-cv-02576-JAM-CKD TIFFANY DOE, an individual; 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
EL DORADO UNION HIGH SCHOOL
DISTRICT; CHAS PRIOR, Individually; STEPHEN WEHR, Individually; TONY DEVILLE, Individually; TARA GRUDIN, Individually; JUSTIN GATLING, Individually; and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, Defendants. 20 Jane Doe and Tiffany Doe (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint against El Dorado Union High School District, and individual Defendants Chas Prior, Stephen Wehr, Tony Deville, Tara Grudin, and Justin Gatling (collectively “Defendants”), alleging Defendants violated Title IX and 42 U.S.C. § 1983, by failing to redress a hostile educational environment after Plaintiffs were sexually assaulted at El Dorado High School (“EDHS.”). Compl., ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 1,4-5. Currently before this Court…