(HC) Carroll v. State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TREMAYNE CARROLL, No. 2:19-cv-1904-WBS-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action. On January 22, 2020, the court dismissed this action after plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis and judgment was duly entered. ECF Nos. 9, 11, 12. On January 27, 2020, plaintiff filed a document titled, “Objection to Dismissal/Ruling, Petition for Reconsideration, Extension of Time (60) days, Appointment of Counsel.” ECF No. 13. The court construes the filing as a request for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and as a request for appointment of counsel. As discussed below, both motions must be denied. Rule 60(b) provides for reconsideration of a final judgment where one of more of the following is…