Sifuentes

Sifuentes v. Roofline, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20202:20-cv-00052California1,527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 GARY SIFUENTES, on behalf of No. 2:20-cv-00052 WBS KJN himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION TO REMAND v. ROOFLINE, INC. d.b.a. ROOFLINE SUPPLY & DELIVERY, an Oregon corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 18 Defendant.

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiff Gary Sifuentes filed this class action 22 against defendant Roofline, Inc. (“Roofline”) in Sacramento 23 County Superior Court alleging various violations of the 24 California Labor Code. (Compl. (Docket No. 1-1, Ex. A).) 25 Defendant removed the action to this court pursuant to the Class 26 Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). (Notice of 27 Removal (Docket No. 1).) Before the court now is plaintiff’s 28 motion to remand for failure to meet the required amount in controversy. (Docket No. 9.) Because of the current situation with regard to the Coronavirus and this court’s General Orders relating thereto, the court decides the motion without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.