Mayes

(PC) Vaden v. Mayes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20202:19-cv-02216California1,459 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST LEE VADEN, No. 2:19-cv-2216 TLN CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DR ROBERT L MAYES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) at California State Prison, Solano (CSP, Solano). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Since plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), his request will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the initial partial filing fee from plaintiff’s trust account and forward it to the Clerk of the Court. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.