(PS) Miner v. Social Security Administration

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MADIHA MINER, No. 2:19-cv-01624-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER SOCIAL SECURITY

ADMINISTRATION,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Madiha Miner (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se, filed a Motion for Cease and 18 Desist Order (ECF No. 3) and a Motion for Summary Judgement (ECF No. 4) on August 22, 19 2019. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On February 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 22 which were served on the Plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 23 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff did not file 24 objections. 25 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 26 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 27 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452,…