Nunes

Nunes v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20201:17-cv-00633California2,912 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANGELINA NUNES, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-00633-DAD-SAB

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD

v. SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURE

AND VACATING MARCH 25, 2020

COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., HEARING

Defendants. (ECF Nos. 63, 64, 66)

16 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiffs’ third supplemental Rule 26 disclosure. The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on March 25, 2020, will be vacated and the parties will not be required to appear at that time. Having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following order. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 5, 2017, based on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.