Nunes
Nunes v. County of Stanislaus
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20201:17-cv-00633California2,912 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANGELINA NUNES, et al., Case No. 1:17-cv-00633-DAD-SAB
Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD
v. SUPPLEMENTAL RULE 26 DISCLOSURE
AND VACATING MARCH 25, 2020
COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., HEARING
Defendants. (ECF Nos. 63, 64, 66)
16 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiffs’ third supplemental Rule 26 disclosure. The Court, having reviewed the record, finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on March 25, 2020, will be vacated and the parties will not be required to appear at that time. Having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, as well as the Court’s file, the Court issues the following order. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 5, 2017, based on the…