Rodriguez

(PC) Crane v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20202:15-cv-00208California9,642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD JOSEPH CRANE, No. 2:15-cv-0208 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RODRIGUEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery is before the court. (ECF No. 191.) Defendant Weeks and the remaining defendants (“group defendants”) filed oppositions. (ECF Nos. 192, 193.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 199.) As discussed below, the motion is partially granted. I. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint This action proceeds on plaintiff’s second amended complaint against defendants Davey, Rodriguez, Robinette, Barton, Probst and Weeks. (ECF No. 16.) The court found plaintiff stated potentially cognizable First and Eighth Amendment claims for relief based on plaintiff’s allegations that such defendants conspired to violate his civil rights while plaintiff was incarcerated at High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”). (ECF No. 26 at 6.) Plaintiff alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.