(SS) Hudson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20202:18-cv-02812California5,704 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARISA HUDSON, No. 2:18-cv-02812 AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-34. For the reasons that follow, petitioner’s motion for summary judgment will be DENIED, and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment will be GRANTED. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff applied for DIB on April 7, 2015. Administrative Record (“AR”) 201. The disability onset date was alleged to be March 22, 2014. Id. The application was disapproved 26 DIB is paid to disabled persons who have contributed to the Disability Insurance Program, and who suffer from a mental or physical disability. 42 U.S.C. § 423(a)(1); Bowen v. City of New…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.