Sherman

(PC) Neale v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20201:18-cv-00342California932 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH NEALE, JR., No. 1:18-cv-00342-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

STU SHERMAN, et al., (Doc. Nos. 14, 23, 24) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Joseph Neale, Jr. is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 5, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action due to plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. No. 14.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. (Id. at 11.) Following the granting of four extensions of time to do so, plaintiff timely filed objections on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.