Biter

(PC) Baca v. Biter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20201:15-cv-01916California1,560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK BACA, No. 1:15-cv-01916-DAD-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

MARTIN BITER, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 127, 130, 156) 16 Plaintiff Frank Baca is a state prisoner proceeding with counsel in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case proceeds on plaintiff’s claims of deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment based on his allegations that the defendant prison officials failed to treat his Hepatitis C Virus and related medical conditions. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 12, 2019, Defendant Dileo moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies by not naming Dr. Dileo in his inmate health…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.