Neuschmid

(HC) Ridley v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20202:20-cv-00085California322 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAY JERROME RIDLEY, No. 2:20-cv-0085 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROBERT NEUSCHMID, WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 10, 2020, the undersigned ordered petitioner to submit either an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the appropriate filing fee. ECF No. 4. To date, petitioner has neither complied with the court’s order nor responded in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign a District Court Judge to this action. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED for failure to comply with a court order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); L.R. 110. These…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.