Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. Bryant

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20202:19-cv-02155California2,345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE GONZALEZ, an individual No. 2:19-cv-02155-MCE-CKD person, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. LANCE CONN, an individual, and JAMES BRYANT, an individual, 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Michelle Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) seeks redress from Defendants Lance Conn (“Conn”) and James Bryant (“Bryant”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for violations of California state law. On September 20, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Solano, against Defendants, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated, alleging claims under the California Anti- Phishing Act of 2005, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 22948 et seq.; the California False Advertising Act, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17500 et seq.; and the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq. Defendants removed the case to this Court on October 24, 2019, on diversity grounds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.