(HC)Ausborn

(HC)Ausborn v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20202:20-cv-00181California409 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY AUSBORN, No. 2:20-cv-0181 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CAL. DEP’T CORRS. & REHAB., Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In an order filed February 10, 2020, petitioner was advised that he must inform the court whether he has presented any federal constitutional claims regarding the disciplinary conviction at issue to the California Supreme Court. (ECF No. 5.) The court gave petitioner thirty days to provide that statement. Petitioner was warned that if he failed to provide the statement to the court, this court would recommend dismissal of this action. Thirty days have passed and petitioner has not filed the statement required by the February 10 order. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to randomly assign a district judge to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.