Fouquette

Fouquette v. City Of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20201:19-cv-01399California823 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRENDA FOUQUETTE, Case No. 1:19-cv-01399-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

VACATING MARCH 25, 2020 HEARING

CITY OF FRESNO, et al., (ECF Nos. 14, 19) Defendants.

THREE DAY DEADLINE

15 Brenda Fouquette (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuant to Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”) on October 4, 2019. On February 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 14.) Pursuant to the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, Defendants’ opposition to the motion for leave to amend was due on March 18, 2020. L.R. 230(c). Defendants did not file a timely opposition to the motion. The Local Rule provides that a party who fails to file a timely opposition is not entitled to be heard in opposition to the motion at oral argument. L.R. 230(c). Accordingly, the previously scheduled hearing set on March 25, 2020 will be vacated 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.