Romancorrea
Romancorrea v. Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTONIO ROMANCORREA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00242-NONE-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMS
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS BARRED
v. BY THE FAVORABLE-TERMINATION
RULE
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al. ORDER THAT, IF PLAINTIFF DOES NOT WISH TO PURSUE AN APPLICATION FOR Defendants. HABEAS CORPUS, HE FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE ORDER THAT THE CLERK’S OFFICE
SEND PLAINTIFF AN APPLICATION FOR
A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 19 Plaintiff Antonio Romancorrea is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil 20 rights action. Plaintiff argues that his conviction and sentence are unlawful, and requests relief 21 “for being incarcerated for the crime that [he] did not commit.” ECF No. 1 at 6. 22 Habeas relief is the exclusive remedy for a prisoner…