Swasey

Swasey v. Seterus, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20202:16-cv-01633California1,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK SWASEY; and TRISHELE No. 2:16-cv-01633-TLN-EFB

SWASEY

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

SETERUS, INC.; FEDERAL NATIONAL

MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 Defendants.

18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Seterus, Inc. (“Seterus”) and Federal National Mortgage Association’s (“Fannie Mae”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF Nos. 31, 32.) Plaintiffs Mark Swasey and Trishele Swasey (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 34.) Defendants filed a joint reply. (ECF No. 35.) This case has a somewhat unusual procedural background. On May 31, 2018, the Court issued an order on nonmoving Defendant CitiMortgage, Inc.’s (“CitiMortgage”) motion to dismiss the complaint. (ECF No. 22.) The Court granted CitiMortgage’s motion to dismiss with leave to amend. (Id. at 7.) On June 14, 2018, this Court issued a separate order on Defendants’ 28 motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.