Leen
Leen v. Thomas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 IRVINE H. LEEN and ALETA No. 2:12-cv-01627-TLN-DMC
LEEN
9 Plaintiffs, 10 v. ORDER
HAROLD M. THOMAS; MICHAEL
RAMSEY; JOHN LANE; and DOES 1-20, inclusive, 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 This matter is before the Court on remand from the Ninth Circuit regarding Defendants Michael Ramsey (“Ramsey”), John Lane (“Lane”), and Harold Thomas’s (“Thomas”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 116.) This Court previously granted Defendants’ motion and dismissed the FAC with prejudice. (ECF No. 120.) Plaintiffs Irvine and Aleta Leen (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appealed. (ECF No. 122.) The Ninth Circuit vacated the judgment and remanded the matter to this Court with instructions. (ECF No. 127.) After carefully considering the Ninth Circuit’s instructions and the parties’ arguments, the Court again GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND …