(PS) Harvey v. Nevada
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY, No. 2:19-cv-01123-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER NEVADA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Daniel Thomas Harvey (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 13, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 65.) Plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 66) and Defendants State of California, State of Nevada, Terry Roeser, Judge Thomas Gregory, Douglas County, Bernadette Smith, and James Halsey filed responses (ECF Nos. 67–70). /// /// 28 This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28…