Gomez

(PC) Dickson v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20201:17-cv-00294California1,775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER DICKSON, No. 1:17-cv-00294-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION AND ADOPTING

G. GOMEZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 26, 27, 29) 16 17 Plaintiff Christopher Dickson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 3, 2019, plaintiff filed a “motion requesting court order that CCI Tehachapi have plaintiff’s legal mail delivered to plaintiff’s cell and plaintiff be given assistance to get to the law library in order to litigate and prosecute this civil complaint or appointment of counsel.” (Doc. No. 26.) The assigned magistrate judge interpreted plaintiff’s motion as a motion for appointment of counsel or, if appointment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.