(SS) Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20201:18-cv-01673California939 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL H. HILL, Case No. 1:18-cv-01673-DAD-JDP

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RE-OPEN

v. THE CASE BE GRANTED

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ECF No.

SECURITY,

OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS Defendant.

Plaintiff Michael H. Hill proceeds in this Social Security appeal without counsel. On July 25, 2019, plaintiff withdrew his appeal, ECF No. 21, and on August 5, 2019, his case was closed, ECF No. 22. On December 4, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion to re-open his case, explaining that he has been suffering from severe mental illness, including psychosis. ECF No. 23. We construe this as a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1). Defendant did not file an opposition to this motion, and we recommend granting relief. Discussion A court may relieve a party of an order by reason of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.