(SS) Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20202:18-cv-01903California2,263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARNOLD D. THOMAS, No. 2:18-cv-1903 DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security1, 15 Defendant. 17 This social security action was submitted to the court without oral argument for ruling on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment.2 Plaintiff’s motion argues that the Administrative Law Judge erred by finding plaintiff at fault for an overpayment of benefits. //// ////

24 1 Andrew Saul became the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on June 17, 2019. See https://www.ssa.gov/agency/commissioner.html (last visited by the court on July 30, 2019). Accordingly, Andrew Saul is substituted in as the defendant in this action. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (referring to the “Commissioner’s Answer”); 20 C.F.R. § 422.210(d) (“the person holding the Office of the Commissioner shall, in his official capacity, be the proper defendant”). 27 2 Both parties have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.