(PS) Ricci v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20202:17-cv-02673California398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KRISTA RICCI, No. 2:17-cv-2673-MCE-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, GIA SAVOY, DAVID CHERNOW, and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants. 17 On March 4, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 75. Plaintiff filed objections on March 18, 2020, and they were considered by the undersigned. ECF No. 76. This Court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.