Spearman

(PC) Ramos v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20202:19-cv-01662California1,525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMY RAY RAMOS, No. 2: 19-cv-1662 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M. SPEARMAN, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends that this action be dismissed. In the original complaint, plaintiff claimed that defendant Spearman, the Warden at High Desert State Prison (“HDSP”), refused to grant plaintiff a parole hearing pursuant to California Proposition 57 in violation of plaintiff’s right to equal protection and due process. (ECF No. 8 at 3.) Plaintiff claimed that defendant Spearman was “holding his own regulations,” and violating plaintiff’s right to a parole hearing pursuant to Proposition 57 and the Constitution. (Id.) In the order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.