Pfeiffer

(HC) Rogers v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20201:20-cv-00142California1,135 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SPENCER EARL ROGERS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00142-JDP Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PETITION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO EXHAUST CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, WARDEN, ECF No. 1 Respondent. 16 Petitioner Spencer Earl Rogers, a state prisoner with counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. The matter is before the court for preliminary review under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Under Rule 4, the judge assigned to a habeas proceeding must examine the habeas petition and order a response thereto unless it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019); Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 1998). Because the petition contains an unexhausted claim, we will order petitioner to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed. Discussion Absent rare circumstances,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.