(PC) Curry v. California Forensic Medical Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20202:18-cv-02513California487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HENRY CURRY, No. 2:18-cv-2513 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. This action proceeds on plaintiff’s claims that defendants were deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious needs by refusing to provide an extra mattress and failing to provide adequate pain medication. On December 20, 2019, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On January 29, 2020, plaintiff was directed to show cause why the motion should not be granted based on plaintiff’s failure to file an opposition. On February 18, 2020, plaintiff filed a two-page opposition stating he had transferred to California Medical Facility on December 19, 2019, and was unaware defendants had filed a motion. Plaintiff asks the court to advise him whether or not his opposition is adequate. First, plaintiff is reminded of his responsibility to timely inform the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.