Morgan
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL MORGAN, an individual, No. 2:19-cv-00800-TLN-KJN and on behalf of others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 ROHR, INC., a corporation; HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND, a corporation, d/b/a UTC AEROSPACE SYSTEMS d/b/a COLLINS AEROSPACE; UNITED TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, a corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusively, Defendant. 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Rohr, Inc., Hamilton Sundstrand, and United Technology Corporation’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1406, or in the alternative Motion to Transfer Venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Strike pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(f). (ECF No. 13.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Transfer pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) and DENIES Defendants’ remaining motions, without prejudice, as moot. /// /// …