(HC) Smith v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20202:19-cv-02282California405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TORIANO GERMAINE SMITH, No. 2:19-cv-2282-KJM-EFB P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTION AND

REHABILITATION, Respondent. 17 Petitioner, proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 31 2020, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 10. On February 26, 2020, the court informed petitioner of the requirements for filing an opposition to any motion to dismiss. That order gave petitioner 21 days to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition and warned petitioner that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 21 days have passed and petitioner has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition nor otherwise responded to the February 26, 2020, order. ///// ///// Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.