Gomez

(PC) Dickson v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20201:17-cv-00294California752 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER DICKSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00294-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX

PARTE APPLICATION TO MODIFY

v. SCHEDULING ORDER GOMEZ, et al., (ECF No. 49) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Christopher Dickson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Gomez, Rios, and Martinez for excessive force, against Defendants Duncan and Esparza for violations of Plaintiff’s due process rights, and against Defendant Sao for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. On December 3, 2019, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to properly exhaust administrative remedies before filing this action against Defendants Duncan, Esparza, Gomez, Martinez, Rios, and Sao or for any claim against these 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.