Matevousian

(PC) Benanti v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20201:17-cv-01556California1,067 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BENANTI, ) No. 1:17-cv-01556-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. ) FOR RECONSIDERATION

) MATEVOUSIAN, et al., (Doc. No. 95) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Michael Benanti brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pro se for the “callous indifference” in medical care he was receiving as an inmate in the U.S. Penitentiary at Atwater, California. (Doc. Nos. 1 (Complaint); 14 (First Amended Complaint) at 2-5.) On January 28, 2020, this Bivens action was dismissed and judgment was entered. (Doc. Nos. 93, 94.) On February 24, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration on various decisions the court had made. (Doc. No. 95.) On March 5, 2020, defendants Thomas Moore, Jr., David Alatary, and Jose Castaneda Correa— all senior staff members at the penitentiary—opposed the motion for reconsideration. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.