Scoggin

Scoggin v. Turning Point Central California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20201:20-cv-00140California4,737 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANELLE RENEE SCOGGIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00140-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

TURNING POINT CENTRAL (ECF No. 1)

CALIFORNIA,

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Danelle Renee Scoggin (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, filed the complaint in this action on January 28, 2020. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Following an initial denial of her in forma pauperis application, Plaintiff has now been granted in forma pauperis status and her complaint is before the Court for screening. (ECF Nos. 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the Court determines that the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.