Diaz

(PC) Hunt v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20201:19-cv-00504California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK HUNT, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00504-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO v. ) DEFENDANTS’ ANSWER

D. DIAZ, et al., ) [ECF No. 35] ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Mark Hunt is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ answer, filed on March 24, 2020, but docketed on March 25, 2020. (ECF No. 35.) On March 23, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file a reply to Defendants’ answer. (ECF No. 33.) On March 24, 2012, the undersigned signed an order denying Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a reply because it was not previously ordered or granted in this case; however, the order was not docketed until March 25, 2012-after Plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.