Bettis

Bettis v. Internal Revenue Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20201:20-cv-00148California805 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 KIRELL FRANCIS BETTIS TRUST and No: 1:20-cv-00148-NONE-SKO KIRELL F. BETTIS-TAYLOR,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE

Plaintiffs, TO OBEY COURT ORDER, DIRECTING

CLERK OF COURT TO UPDATE

v. PLAINTIFF’S NAME ON THE DOCKET;

AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS),

K. GREEN, and A. RASCHKE, CLOSE CASE

16 Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 3, 4, 5, 7, 9)

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

18 Plaintiff Kirell F. Bettis-Taylor1, a state prisoner, is appearing pro se in this civil rights action. On January 29, 2020, plaintiff filed a complaint with the court, but did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) nor did he pay the filing fee. On February 18, 2020, the court, having concluded that plaintiff is subject to the three strikes provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that he failed to satisfy the imminent danger exception contained within that provision, ordered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.