(SS) Halloran v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20202:18-cv-03230California3,139 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHELLE C. HALLORAN, No. 2:18-cv-3230-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for a period of disability and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) under Title II of the Social Security Act. The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 15 & 18. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is granted, the Commissioner’s motion is denied, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings. I. Background Plaintiff filed an application for a period of disability and DIB, alleging that she had been disabled since March 24, 2015. Administrative Record (“AR”) at 188-89. After her application was denied initially and upon reconsideration (id. at 85-88, 93-98), a hearing was held before administrative law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.