Corral

(PS) Grant v. Corral

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20202:19-cv-01495California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK A. GRANT, No. 2:19-cv-01495-MCE-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER MICHAEL CORRAL et al., (ECF Nos. 28, 30) Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is defendant Michael Corral’s motion to set aside the default entered against him. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition (ECF No. 35) to which Corral has replied. (ECF No. 37.) For the reasons that follow, the court SETS ASIDE the default entered against defendant Corral. The present case involves the City of Sacramento and plaintiff disputing certain violations plaintiff was cited for regarding the condition of his home and property. Plaintiff names three defendants in his complaint: Michael Corral, Jose Mendez, and the City of Sacramento. (ECF No. 17.) On November 26, 2019, the City and Mendez filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 7.) Defendant Corral was not joined in that motion, presumably because he had not yet been served. (See id.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.