Jones

(PC) Miller v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20202:19-cv-01697California1,602 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BRADLEY JAMES MILLER, No. 2:19-cv-01697 CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER SCOTT JONES, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a civil detainee1 proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and plaintiff has consented to have all matters in this action before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Plaintiff has submitted the affidavit required by § 1915(a) showing that plaintiff is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security for them. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The federal in forma pauperis statute authorizes federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,

1 FN1. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.