(PC) Dunbar v. California Corrections Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20202:19-cv-01359California1,930 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDDIE LAMAR DUNBAR, No. 2:19-cv-1359 JAM DB Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that officers used excessive force against him, denied him medical treatment, and threatened him. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint for screening. (ECF No. 17.) For the reasons set forth below the court will recommend that the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. SCREENING I. Legal Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.