King

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND D. CHESTER, No. 1:16-cv-01257-DAD-GSA (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

AUDREY KING, et al., (Doc. No. 33) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Raymond D. Chester is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2019, plaintiff filed a “NOTICE of INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL” of the assigned magistrate judge’s July 2, 2019 order approving defendants’ stipulated protective order. (Doc. No. 33). That filing, however, is not an interlocutory appeal, and instead is directed to the undersigned. (See id. at 1) (“APPEAL TO U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE TO REVERSE PROTECTIVE ORDER TO DEFENDANTS”). The court sua sponte construes plaintiff’s filing as objections to the magistrate judge’s nondispositive order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72. Plaintiff’s objections will be overruled. First, plaintiff’s objections were served…