Limon

Limon v. Circle K Stores Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20201:18-cv-01689California5,762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNESTO LIMON, an individual, on No. 1:18-cv-01689-SKO behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL

v. (Doc. 47) CIRCLE K STORES INC., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 16 Defendants.

18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Ernesto Limon (“Plaintiff”)’s “Motion to Compel Further Responses to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents” (the “Motion to Compel”), filed February 25, 2020. (Doc. 47.) Plaintiff and Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Circle K”) filed their “Joint Statement” directed to the Motion to Compel, as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on March 11, 2020. (Doc. 48.) The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The hearing set for March 18, 2020, was therefore vacated. (Doc. 49.) Having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.