Sherman

(PC) Denham v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20201:19-cv-01176California1,095 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL JOHN DENHAM, 1:19-cv-01176-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

vs. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER BE DENIED

STU SHERMAN, et al., (ECF No. 21.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

20 I. BACKGROUND Paul John Denham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 29, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On October 17, 2019, the court screened the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and issued an order dismissing the Complaint for violation of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 13.) On November 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint, which awaits the requisite screening by the court under 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.