Sherman
(PC) Denham v. Sherman
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20201:19-cv-01176California1,095 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PAUL JOHN DENHAM, 1:19-cv-01176-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
vs. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER BE DENIED
STU SHERMAN, et al., (ECF No. 21.) Defendants.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
20 I. BACKGROUND Paul John Denham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 29, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On October 17, 2019, the court screened the Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and issued an order dismissing the Complaint for violation of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 13.) On November 18, 2019, Plaintiff filed the First Amended Complaint, which awaits the requisite screening by the court under 28…