Docanto

(PC) Casey v. Docanto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20201:20-cv-00420California2,761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES ARTHUR CASEY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00420-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF v. ) LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

M. DOCANTO, et al., ) [ECF No. 1] )

Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff James Arthur Casey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was filed on March 17, 2020, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division. On March 23, 2020, the action was transferred to this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s complaint filed on March 17, 2020, is before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.