Fisher

(HC) Page v. Fisher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20201:19-cv-01463California1,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Background 22 In 1995, petitioner was sentenced to twenty-five years to life in prison for murder, with a 23 sentence enhancement of two years for the use of a firearm in the commission of a felony. ECF 24 No. 1 at 5. Petitioner seeks relief from a 2018 Board of Parole Hearings (“BPH”) denial of

1 We have reviewed the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s inmate locator 26 listing for the petitioner and take judicial notice of it per Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. See California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Inmate Locator, https://inmatelocator.cdcr.ca.gov/ (search “Search for Inmate” for “Jason Page”). Petitioner remains incarcerated, was again denied parole on January 8, 2020, and will have his next parole parole. See generally ECF No. 1. Specifically, petitioner seeks a review of the substantive findings of BPH, arguing that it: (1) failed to consider relevant mitigating factors in determining his suitability for parole, (2) relied on mischaracterizations of the evidence and conjecture, and (3) failed to support the parole denial with evidence that petitioner is dangerous. See id. at 2. In their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.