(PS) Starchyk v. US Department of Homeland Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VLADISLAV VYACHESLAVOVICH No. 2:19-cv-1796 TLN DB PS
STARCHYK,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK
TO SEND MATERIALS FOR SERVICE
v. AND REQUIRING SERVICE BY
UNITED STATES MARSHAL
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND
IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Defendants. 18 Plaintiff Vladislav Starchyk is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 10, 2019, plaintiff filed a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Plaintiff’s complaint challenges the denial of plaintiff’s petition for naturalization “N-400” application. (Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 6.) The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). …