Bobbala

(PC) Gleason v. Bobbala

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20202:19-cv-01203California4,933 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY GLEASON, No. 2:19-cv-1203 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

T. LINDQUIST, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Also pending are plaintiff’s various motions for miscellaneous relief. ECF Nos. 3, 7, 15, 20, 25, 26, 27, 29. I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2; ECF No. 3 at 3-4; ECF No. 18. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff will be assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.