Ojingwa

(PS) Iegorova v. Ojingwa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20202:19-cv-01552California720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIUDMYLA IEGOROVA, No. 2:19-cv-1552 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ALEXANDER OJINGUA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Liudmyla Iegorova has requested authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 6, 2019, the Court received as undeliverable mail correspondence sent from the Court. Pursuant to Local Rule 183 if a plaintiff fails to notify the Court within sixty-three (63) days of a current address, the Court may dismiss the action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Local Rule 183(b). Here, the sixty-three-day deadline has long passed and plaintiff has not provided a current address. ANALYSIS The factors to be weighed in determining whether to dismiss a case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.