Hamlin

(PC) Reinhardt v. Hamlin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20201:19-cv-00892California704 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID MICHAEL REINHARDT, No. 1:19-cv-00892-DAD-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER FINDING APPEAL FRIVOLOUS

AND REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS

W. KENT HAMLIN, et al., STATUS Defendants. (Doc. No. 40)

16 This action proceeded by way of a second amended complaint (“SAC”) filed by plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, on September 19, 2019. (Doc No. 27.) On December 4, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s SAC be dismissed with prejudice because it failed to state a cognizable claim and was indeed frivolous. (Doc No. 30.) These findings and recommendations were adopted by the undersigned on March 16, 2020, and the case was dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. (Doc. No. 35.) Plaintiff subsequently appealed the dismissal order and filed a notice of appeal on March 23, 2020. (Doc. No. 37.) On March 25, 2020, the Ninth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.