(PS) Bartlett v. State Bar of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20202:19-cv-00330California646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

‘ 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ALAN M. BARTLETT, No. 2:19-cv-00330-MCE-AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA and

PHILLIP TREVINO,

14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff proceeded in this matter pro se, and accordingly this matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff, a state prisoner, was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 3. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2), the court assessed plaintiff an initial partial filing fee and obligated plaintiff thereafter to make monthly payments until the statutory filing fee of $350.00 is paid in full. ECF No. 4. On April 26, 2019, judgment was entered dismissing the case, and the case was closed. ECF Nos. 6, 7. On April 29, 2019, plaintiff filed objections to the court’s order for payment of the filing fee. ECF No. 9. On June 17, 2019, plaintiff filed a “motion to quash” the order for payment of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.