Fry

(PC) Thomas v. Fry

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20202:19-cv-01041California1,203 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, No. 2:19-cv-1041 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J.C. FRY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 3, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend and the court gave plaintiff’s instructions and guidance as to the contents of his amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint. As plaintiff knows, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.