(PC) Perryman v. Director, CDCR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVD PERRYMAN, No. 2:19-cv-2480 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DIRECTOR, CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On January 21, 2020, this court recommended this action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim cognizable under 42 U.S.C.§ 1983. On February 5, 2020, this court granted plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file objections to that recommendation. Plaintiff has now requested a stay of these proceedings based on prison lockdowns, his assertions that he is receiving insufficient pen fillers, and an anticipated hand surgery. In addition, plaintiff requests the appointment of counsel. Based on the prison lockdowns, this court finds plaintiff has shown good cause for a continuance of the deadline for filing objections to the January 21 findings and recommendations. If lockdowns continue, plaintiff may seek…